---
product_id: 3581025
title: "Richard I"
brand: "john gillingham"
price: "€ 71.06"
currency: EUR
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 10
url: https://www.desertcart.es/products/3581025-richard-i
store_origin: ES
region: Spain
---

# Richard I

**Brand:** john gillingham
**Price:** € 71.06
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Richard I by john gillingham
- **How much does it cost?** € 71.06 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.es](https://www.desertcart.es/products/3581025-richard-i)

## Best For

- john gillingham enthusiasts

## Why This Product

- Trusted john gillingham brand quality
- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Richard I

## Images

![Richard I - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/412nclfehiL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 







  
  
    Statesmen as well as General
  

*by H***N on Reviewed in the United States on August 15, 2015*

John Gillingham describes his book on King Richard I, one in a series of biographies of English Monarchs by Yale University Press, as a political biography. In his preface to the book he stresses that he is not attempting to analyze Richard Plantagenet the man, but rather the political legacy of King Richard I, and he explicitly excludes from his discussion Richard’s “inner life.” He does not look at him as a son, husband or brother, but only in the context of his effectiveness as a ruler — first as a deputy for his mother and/or father and later in his own right as Duke of Aquitaine and King of England. Essentially, Gillingham sets out to determine whether Richard was a “good” or a “bad” king.The focus is justified by the fact that King Richard has been both lionized and vilified by historians over the centuries. As Gillingham catalogues, medieval historians saw in him a hero on the scale of King Arthur, Roland and Charlemagne. Later Plantagenet kings were judged in comparison with him — the highest praise being to come near to equaling him. Yet during the Reformation and the later Tudor era Richard started to fall into disrepute as a result of Protestant condemnation of the crusades. By the 19th century it was commonplace to dismiss his achievements as paltry because they did not promote Victorian values such as empire building, trade and sound fiscal policy. In the 20th century RIchard was condemned for spending too little time in England and “oppressing the masses” with his taxes for “worthless” ventures such as the Third Crusade — and his ransom, of course.Gillingham points out that, long before the historical debate, Richard inspired extreme opinions in his lifetime. Adulated and adored by some of his subjects and supporters, he was demonized by his political enemies, particularly Philip II of France. He is credited with abusing noblewomen and maidens, with hounding his father to his grave, murdering his political opponents, and with betraying the cause of Christ while in the Holy Land. The ironic result, Gillingham suggests, is that the most objective contemporary commentary on Richard probably come from Muslim sources.  Unfortunately for us, these only describe his actions during the less than two years in which he was active in the Holy Land.Given the treacherous nature of his sources, Gillingham does an admirable job of depicting Richard Plantagenet based on what he actually did rather than on what people said about him. In doing so, he convincingly builds the case that Richard was a remarkably effective monarch — judged by the standards and values of his day. In doing so, he highlights the absurdity of expecting a mercantilist monarch in a feudal kingdom, much less a mild and tolerant ruler in a brutal and violent age.What emerges is a complex but on the whole admirable and competent leader, a statesman as well as a general. As Gillingham documents, Richard was not just a dashing knight and outstanding commander, nor merely a brilliant tactician, strategist and logistician. He was a sound financial manager, who alone among the leaders of the Third Crusade was consistently in a financial position to recruit and provision troops. He managed to raise a truly enormous ransom without, in fact, beggaring his subjects. He was, to be sure, creative in his methods of raising funds — from selling offices to selling conquests (Cyprus).  Rather than wrinkling our noses at these allegedly distasteful practices, however, we should consider that the alternative would indeed have been to tax the innocent poor rather than milk the grasping rich. He was also an astonishingly effective diplomat, not only in his complicated negotiations with Saladin, but in turning his erstwhile German enemies into allies, and in his tedious but eventually effective efforts to pry the Counts of Flanders and Toulouse out of the French camp and into his own.Last but not least, despite his reluctance to discuss the private side of Richard, Gillingham does offer insight into Richard’s personality. We get glimpses of a man who was very well educated, loved music and was more than superficially pious. We learn that he had a fine and subtle sense of humor and often spoke half in jest, often using a light-hearted tone to deliver serious messages. While he clearly inherited the infamous Plantagenet temper, it did dominate him, and he was not irrational even when angry. Most important, Gillingham’s Richard is a man of many parts far removed from the buffoon-like Richard found in so many films and novels that reduce him to a brutal idiot or a jovial but empty-headed figurehead.This biography is well-worth reading and is a must for anyone interested in the period.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 







  
  
    Finding a king lost in legends and battles
  

*by D***N on Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2011*

John Gillingham had a tough project for several reasons. Unlike so many of the early English kings, Richard I has plenty written about him. The problem is that so much of it is either made up or grossly exaggerated. Gillingham's first chapter called "The Best of Kings, the Worst of Kings" does a nice job of explaining this problem. What makes a biography of Richard doubly difficult is that the man never stood still. He was in England less than 10% of the time in his reign so his contributions to domestic policies were small or unknown or shrouded in the work of the men he left behind to govern. Gillingham fully explains this dilemma but this does not lessen the problem of determining what exactly Richard contributed to English history per se other than some very large taxes and a great legend. Richard is most in one place on Crusade in the Holy Land. Here Gillingham tracks the man in a way that brings life to the legend. That was for me the best part of the book, especially Gillingham's use of Muslim sources to describe both Richard the man and his exploits. When Richard was in France he was constantly in motion and the why, when and where of his life are hard to trace. Gillingham tracks Richard as well as can be done but the man's motives  are often not clear and his whereabouts mostly but not always clear. There are five maps after the text, one of the Holy Land and four of parts of Normandy. I constantly was flipping back to them, distracting in itself, but often the reference in the text is not shown on any of the maps. For me it would have helped the flow of the book to have more frequent and more detailed maps placed within the text itself, especially since Richard spent so much of his reign in France. (A map or two of where Richard was held captive in Germany and his various movements there also would have helped.) A final reason this biography was such a challenge is that Richard himself seemed to be a mass of contradictions, for example,  his back and forth hostile relationship with his father, his intriguing relationship with the Muslim leader Saladin, his relationship with his brothers. All of it is interesting yet I kept wondering "why." With other kings up to Richard one can frequently get a sense of one or more underlying character motivations, a certain consistency of their life from adolescence on. I did not get that here. This is not Gillingham's fault. I am not sure anyone can venture to claim underlying motivations for this man without becoming too speculative. So this is a fine biography but it was frustrating at times. Tracking where Richard was at any point, especially in France, could have used more detailed and frequent maps and the man himself remains for me a courageous but otherwise enigmatic figure.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 







  
  
    Greatest hero of his age or ungrateful son? You decide.
  

*by M***C on Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2007*

This is the most balanced royal biography I've read to date. Gillingham begins by tracing Richard's reputation through the ages, beginning at it's peak in the 12th and 13th centuries, when he was considered one of the great leaders of his time to it's nadir in the 1950's when academics began to consider him a "Bad son and a bad king..." who spent far more time on the continent than he ever did in England, leaving it in terrible financial straits when he went off to fight in the crusades, and began to conjecture about his sexual preference. Gillingham explores and discounts these and other myths about Richard and his reign simply by letting the historical record speak for itself and allowing the reader to draw their own conclusions, rather than stating his own opinions as facts and then selectively using the historical record to back them up. He also isn't afraid to admit that he can't be sure of something when the historical evidence is either too thin or simply obscured by the mists of time, which is refreshing. The author is among the first to rely heavily on contemporary Muslim sources in constructing his portrait of Richard, because he believes they are less biased in their evaluation of Richard's character than a European chronicler might be. These sources are, for the most part, complimentary, and add great perspective and depth to the reader's understanding of Richard as a warrior.  Gillingham strikes the perfect balance between academic research and popular history, making the book very readable. Whether you're interested in Richard himself, or merely seeking an introduction into reading further about his fascinating family dynamics, or the crusades, this is the book to read!

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.es/products/3581025-richard-i](https://www.desertcart.es/products/3581025-richard-i)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Spain*
*Store origin: ES*
*Last updated: 2026-02-21*