Scottex Organic

Thought these would be great value, but when you see the difference in size between these loo rolls and a leading brand you can see they are half the size, so whilst you are buying 96 rolls, it would really be 48 rolls from a leading brand. This needs to be taken into consideration when buying. Other than this the product is fine.

The thickness and softness were what you would expect from Andrex, however sold under a different name, the rolls are a fair bit smaller than Andrex. Not sure whether I would re-purchase, or just pay a bit more for Andrex.

It came as one big pack, the 96 rolls which made up from 6 x 16 rolls pack. When I first brought it out from the box, I immediately felt a little disappointed as these rolls seems a lot smaller and thinner even though its stating 16 rolls in a pack, but the thickness just doesn't feel right at all. Therefore, I decided to have a good comparison to those I currently have at home. Here are 3 different Andrex pack (see the pictures) the middle one which marked with 'S' is the roll from the 96 rolls pack. These are all 2 ply, the lilac Andrex is 170 sheets/roll, the peach colour Andrex is 200 sheets/roll, but the scottex (Andrex) doesn't state the number sheet. I then took one roll out from each pack and put them together, as picture showing, the scottex is much shorter and the roll size is smaller & thinner, if the lilac colour pack of Andrex is 170 sheets per roll as it stating, the scottex must be way less than that!! the overall size is shorter and smaller (thinner) roll than those normal Andrex which bought from local supermarket. I like to buy in bulk, so that don't have to keeps on buying every other week! It may seems a bargain for 96 rolls pack when I first saw it and bought it immediately, however realised the roll size is much smaller and shorter in length, douted a bargain. check out the pictures and judge it from there, hope this being helpful towards buying consideration.

Ok so these are clearly smaller than uk rolls by about 15mm and whilst they maybe made by the Andrex company they are definitely not the same quality. That said they cost a lot less. They're not as soft as gentle clean Andrex but on a par with the quality, I was happy with the thickness of Scottex.

Expensive and small you would think it was diamonds. As per the title. It can be said to be soft please see the two pictures of a container placed on top of both a competitors roll and this roll. Although both roles were the same with this brands toilet roll compressed much more very easily showing that the inDividual sheets i’m not pulled tightly or compressed to each other. In fact when you pick the role up you can fill this as there is movement in the sheets. Almost as much movement as in the price I paid. £1 per roll absolutely disgusting but needs must.

Good price for these (paid just over a tenner), though I would be miffed if I paid twice that. I knew what to expect from previous Scottex reviews - I'm assuming Scottex is the Spanish variety of UK Andrex :) My usual everyday loo roll is Nicky Elite 3-ply, their packaging states - "170 Sheets, Average Roll Length 21.25m, Average Total Area 21m²". All UK loo rolls I've purchased (maybe a formal requirement?) have this information on packs. Unfortunately, Scottex supplies no such info - but Scottex "Classic" reviews (also on Amazon) imply "Classic" rolls have 150 sheets each - and are 2-ply - not sure about the "Original" variety. Scottex Original toilet paper is described as having "Cotton Extract with Softness And Strength" (so, maybe they're actually 3-Ply?) on their official (Spanish) website. In any case, I'm happy with what I paid, I expect they won't last as long as Nicky rolls do, but, still a great price. PS: Added some photos - Nicky Elite 3-Ply on the left, Scottex Original roll on the right.

Do not be fooled by the number of rolls in this pack! They are tiny, cheap, very thin and you'll be much better off looking for a 54 or 48 pack size of 'normally size toilet rolls not designed for a hobbit. We're going through at least 4 a day in house of 5... Will not buy again.. more recycling from the toilet roll middle than useful paper... rubbish buy and not good value for money

It’s loo roll, it does it’s job and it works out cheaper than even the pound shop on a roll for roll basis. Soft, but not as soft as competitors. Incidentally, watched a program that said this sort of paper is better for the sewage system than the thick expensive kind as this degrades quicker in the sewers.